How to decide what goes into an MVP
Start from the riskiest assumption, not a feature list. Ask what must be true for the business to work, for example that clinics will pay to reduce no-shows, or that buyers will trust a new marketplace. The MVP should test that assumption with real users as directly as possible. Everything that does not help answer it can wait for a later release. A sharp assumption also makes the MVP easier to explain to investors.
A simple prioritization exercise helps founders make hard cuts. Sort every proposed feature into the groups below, then build only the first group and the smallest useful part of the second. Teams are usually surprised by how much they can remove without weakening the test.
Manual work is a powerful scoping tool. Many successful products began with founders handling matching, onboarding or reporting by hand behind a simple interface. This concierge approach delivers value to early users immediately and shows exactly which steps are worth automating once demand is proven.
- N1.aMust have: the product fails its core purpose without it.
- N1.bShould have: improves the experience but can be handled manually at first.
- N1.cCould have: nice ideas that need evidence from real users.
- N1.dWill not have now: explicitly postponed, so scope stays honest.


