When to choose Next.js, and when not to
Next.js shines for public, search-facing products: marketing sites, content hubs, ecommerce storefronts, documentation and SaaS products that combine a marketing site with an application. Server components, static generation and incremental regeneration deliver fast first loads and complete HTML for search engines and AI crawlers, while React handles rich interactivity where needed.
It is not always the best fit. A small brochure site with little interactivity can be simpler with a static site generator such as Astro, an internal dashboard behind a login gains little from server rendering and may be simpler as a Vite single-page app, and teams without Node.js hosting experience need a plan for running it. Our Next.js vs React comparison covers these trade-offs.
Next.js also brings concepts, such as server and client component boundaries and caching rules, that teams need to learn. The payoff is large for the right products, but choose it deliberately rather than by default. We usually run a short spike to confirm the fit before committing a large project.


